Brown and Caldwell Home Page

Brown and Caldwell engineers and scientists are technical and thought leaders in the environmental sector. Meet the people who have been advancing innovation for more than 70 years.
Author      Title/Abstract      

“Better Treatment Focusing on SRT Not Solids Inventory"
Author: Eric J. Wahlberg, Barbara Browne, Noble Fulcher, Biju George, Donald Linn, Larry Scanlan, Dan Siler, Wendy Anderson, Mike Daniels, Steve Rogowski and Steve Walker.
Date: 7/209
WE&T, Vol. 21, No. 3, March 2009, pp. 30-39

The activated sludge process is widely used because of its performance, versatility, and controllability. Unfortunately, its controllability also may be the source of operating problems, including poor solids settleability and noncompliant effluent quality. Even when properly designed, operated, and maintained, an activated sludge process is expensive and will only become more so as power costs increase. given this expense and biosolids disposal challenges, treatment plant owners and operators must shift their focus. rather than simply “making permit” (meeting the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] permit requirements that regulate effluent quality), owners and operators should strive to “make permit and produce biosolids as cost-effectively as possible.” This goal better accounts for the environmental, economic, and energy pressures today’s owners and operators face. To meet this goal, owners and operators must optimize their wastewater management systems. optimization often is defined as “doing more with less.” Historically, municipal treatment plant personnel have assumed this meant “minimize operating expenses” and spent much time and effort attempting to do so. Unfortunately, some cost reductions did not lower overall treatment costs. Inspired by The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (E.M. Goldratt and J. Cox, 2004), staff at the metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati (MSD) and the Denver Metro Wastewater Reclamation District (MWRD) used a different approach to optimize their activated sludge processes. They had different reasons for doing so. MSD wanted to optimize four treatment plants — mill creek, Little Miami, Polk run, and Sycamore — to reduce operating costs while maintaining effluent quality. MWRD, on the other hand, focused on maintaining effluent compliance during permit-complying upgrades and lengthy construction activities involving prolonged process and equipment outages.

This library contains published materials for which copyrights may be owned by entities other than Brown and Caldwell, but which are stored for limited uses by BC employees. Technical papers authored by BC employees generally may be printed and shared electronically with clients and prospective clients outside BC. Technical papers cannot be sold, and technical papers shared outside BC must have proper attribution of the original sponsoring organization or conference where the paper was presented. This attribution is embedded in each technical paper file when it is loaded into this library. Published articles from magazines or trade journals which are stored in this library are FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY and SHOULD NOT be distributed to clients or others outside BC, without express permission of the copyright owner. For questions regarding copyrights associated with any document in this library, or questions regarding copyrights in general, contact the Legal Department.